Tabrez Ahmad'sTechnolex
Tabrez Ahmad's Technolex
Technology, Education R&D, Consultancy,Hyperawareness,ODR,
Network of Law
The objective of the blog is to provide a fair analysis and awareness of legal issues in an easy way for the understanding of the people at large
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Wish all the Blog Readers a Very Happy & Colourful Holi
Thanks all of you once again on the eve of Holi for all cooperation and encouragement shown to us in the last one year.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
The Bilski Decision: May Require Expert Strategies to Manage Its Impact on Intellectual Property
The U.S. Supreme Court's highly anticipated ruling in the Bilski case has the potential to alter the landscape for business method patents and send shockwaves through the tech transfer community. Though no one can predict for certain the outcome, many observers believe the days of business method patents are numbered.
For Technology Transfer Organisations, it's critical to prepare now and determine your patent portfolio's exposure to Bilski-related turmoil, decide how vigorously you want to defend affected patents, if at all, and explore alternatives for protecting relevant IP.
That's why you should be focused on the practical steps and strategies you can take now to prepare for the fall-out — and minimize any negative impact on IP in development, already-patented innovations, pending applications, and existing license agreements.
Now the technology transfer organisations must focus on the following issues in advance to avoid any adverse impact:
- What's affected: The scope extends further than you might think, beyond software and IT
- Understanding the machine-or-transformation test
- Pre-disclosure: Working with faculty to configure innovations with M&T test in mind
- Disclosure and triage/assessment: How should your investment and patent criteria change post-Bilski?
- Alternatives to patent protection: trade secrets, know-how, copyrights
- Assessing and minimizing impact on existing licenses
- Recalibrating enforcement actions
- A bright side? Impact on patent trolls
- Impact on non-US rights
- Using "do-not-publish" applications during pendency
- Claim construction to match PTO guidance
- Considering reissue applications for issued patents
- Responding to rejections
- etc.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
US removes Saudi Arabia from IPR 'watchlist'
The United States on Wednesday removed Saudi Arabia from a government list of alleged intellectual property rights violators, saying it has made "significant progress" in tackling the issue.
The decision to remove Saudi Arabia from the "Special 301 Watch List" resulted from a review of the effectiveness of IPR protection and enforcement in the kingdom, the top US trade official said.
"Saudi Arabia has made significant progress in improving protection for intellectual property rights during the past year," said US Trade Representative Ron Kirk.
"Over the last several years, Saudi Arabia has stepped up its enforcement actions, strengthened its legal framework, and demonstrated a commitment to fostering innovation and creativity," he said.
Kirk's office publishes a "Priority Watch List" and a "Watch List" annually as required under the law to identify countries that "deny adequate and effective protection for IPR or deny fair and equitable market access for persons that rely on intellectual property protection."
Last year, the Priority Watch List comprised China, Russia, Canada, Indonesia, Algeria, Argentina, Chile, India, Israel, Pakistan, Thailand and Venezuela.
Saudi Arabia was among 33 trading partners on the lower level Watch List, meriting what the USTR office called "bilateral attention to address the underlying IPR problems."
Others were Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Spain, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
Task Force To Address Intellectual Property Crimes in USA
On February 12, 2010, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced the formation of a new Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property as part of a Department-wide initiative to confront the growing number of domestic and international intellectual property (IP) crimes. The Task Force, to be chaired by the Deputy Attorney General, will focus on strengthening efforts to combat intellectual property crimes through close coordination with state and local law enforcement partners as well as international counterparts. It will also monitor and coordinate overall intellectual property enforcement efforts at the Department, with an increased focus on the international aspects of IP enforcement, including the links between IP crime and international organized crime. Building on previous efforts in the Department to target intellectual property crimes, the Task Force will also serve as an engine of policy development to address the evolving technological and legal landscape of this area of law enforcement.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
Thursday, February 25, 2010
India is 50th in World Intellectual Property Rankings
The specific intellectual property rankings are also notable as they highlight the absurdity of the IIPA's ongoing campaign characterizing India as weak on IP. Canada's ranks 50th in the survey for intellectual property rights, tied with countries such as France, the UK, and New Zealand . The ranking is all the more remarkable since one of the primary data sources for the ranking is the IIPA itself. In other words, even after using IIPA data, India ranks alongside many other countries that are typically applauded by the IIPA for their IP policies.
In fact, the IIPA recommended ten countries for inclusion on the USTR Special 301 Priority Watch List: Argentina, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, Indonesia, Mexico, People's Republic of China, the Philippines and Russia.
- Argentina - 67
- Canada-13th
- Chile - 49
- China - 63
- Costa Rica - 67
- India - 50
- Indonesia - 108
- Mexico - 59
- Philippines - 63
- Russia - 72
Source: www.michaelgeist.ca
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
Friday, February 19, 2010
IGNOU Admissions Open's for Law Programmes
These are online programmes(Master of Intellectual Property Law ) Post –Graduate Diploma in Legal Process Outsourcing. Post –Graduate Certificate in Cyber Law and distance education programmes (Diploma in Paralegal Practice and other Law Programmes)
In the two year Master of Intellectual Property Law ,Law graduates have the added option to obtain a dual certification by studying at the QUT(Queensland University of Technology) in Australia. It is open to graduates from any discipline. One year Post –Graduate Diploma in Legal Process Outsourcing is open to law graduates including final year students. Top performer are offered internship with LPO industry leaders. Six – Month Post Graduate Certificate in Cyber Law is open to graduate from any discipline and Final year students of the 5-year integrated law programme.One year Diploma in Paralegal Practice is available through distance mode and eligibility is 10+2 or equivalent or BPP from IGNOU.
Other School of Law Programmes include Ph.D in law, Diploma in Intellectual, Property Rights, P.G Certification in Patent Practice, Certificate in Human Rights, Certificate in Consumer Protection. Programmes commence on March 1,2010 and Last date for enrollment is March 31,2010 A late fee of Rs.200 on all enrollments between March 1 to March 31,2010.Programmes are being delivered and managed by Rainmaker. Prospective students may also contact Rainmaker for additional information on the programmes.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Workshop on How to Manage Online Identity in ILI New Delhi
Cyberspace & Intellectual Property Foundation (CIPFO)
is organising a workshop on
"How to Manage Online Identity"
Feb. 26, 2010 - Indian Law Institute, New Delhi - India
http://www.cipfo.org/managing_online.php
The workshop shall focus on technical, legal, and social aspects of Domains and User Names in Web 2.0 environment including those created on Facebook and Twitter.
Well-known experts from legal and new media would share their views and experiences.
Current and upcoming Internet entrepreneurs can ask their queries in the Q&A session that would follow the various sessions as mentioned below -:
- Choosing the right Domain Name
- How to Protect your Domain Names
- Whats in a name , A Web 2.0 perspective
- Buying and Selling of Domains
The workshop is being organised by Cyberspace and Intellectual Property Foundation (CIPFO), an organization headquartered at New Delhi, India, formed with an aim to disseminate knowledge about the Cyberspace and Intellectual Property and is a fusion of Internet and intellectual property professionals .
A certificate of participation shall be provided to the registered participants after the successful completion of the workshop.
Registration & Pricing
Interested participants can see the program details and register with us by following the link below and completing the Registration formalities.
Click for Workshop Registration
A fee is charged from the participants as per following :
One Delegate - Rs. 3,000/-
Two or more delegates from the same organization get 10% discount.
For further queries contact.
Jay Paudyal,
CIPFO - Cyberspace & Intellectual Property Foundation
18 - Pusa Road, Third Floor,
New Delhi - 110005. India,
Phone No. : +91.11.28755155
Mobile No. : +91.9871414444
Email : contact@cipfo.org
Web : www.cipfo.org
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
Thursday, February 11, 2010
National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority is the Need of Hour
Source: Spicy IP
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281