Tabrez Ahmad'sTechnolex
Tabrez Ahmad's Technolex
Technology, Education R&D, Consultancy,Hyperawareness,ODR,
Network of Law
The objective of the blog is to provide a fair analysis and awareness of legal issues in an easy way for the understanding of the people at large
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Wish all the Blog Readers a Very Happy & Colourful Holi
Thanks all of you once again on the eve of Holi for all cooperation and encouragement shown to us in the last one year.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
The Bilski Decision: May Require Expert Strategies to Manage Its Impact on Intellectual Property
The U.S. Supreme Court's highly anticipated ruling in the Bilski case has the potential to alter the landscape for business method patents and send shockwaves through the tech transfer community. Though no one can predict for certain the outcome, many observers believe the days of business method patents are numbered.
For Technology Transfer Organisations, it's critical to prepare now and determine your patent portfolio's exposure to Bilski-related turmoil, decide how vigorously you want to defend affected patents, if at all, and explore alternatives for protecting relevant IP.
That's why you should be focused on the practical steps and strategies you can take now to prepare for the fall-out — and minimize any negative impact on IP in development, already-patented innovations, pending applications, and existing license agreements.
Now the technology transfer organisations must focus on the following issues in advance to avoid any adverse impact:
- What's affected: The scope extends further than you might think, beyond software and IT
- Understanding the machine-or-transformation test
- Pre-disclosure: Working with faculty to configure innovations with M&T test in mind
- Disclosure and triage/assessment: How should your investment and patent criteria change post-Bilski?
- Alternatives to patent protection: trade secrets, know-how, copyrights
- Assessing and minimizing impact on existing licenses
- Recalibrating enforcement actions
- A bright side? Impact on patent trolls
- Impact on non-US rights
- Using "do-not-publish" applications during pendency
- Claim construction to match PTO guidance
- Considering reissue applications for issued patents
- Responding to rejections
- etc.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
US removes Saudi Arabia from IPR 'watchlist'
The United States on Wednesday removed Saudi Arabia from a government list of alleged intellectual property rights violators, saying it has made "significant progress" in tackling the issue.
The decision to remove Saudi Arabia from the "Special 301 Watch List" resulted from a review of the effectiveness of IPR protection and enforcement in the kingdom, the top US trade official said.
"Saudi Arabia has made significant progress in improving protection for intellectual property rights during the past year," said US Trade Representative Ron Kirk.
"Over the last several years, Saudi Arabia has stepped up its enforcement actions, strengthened its legal framework, and demonstrated a commitment to fostering innovation and creativity," he said.
Kirk's office publishes a "Priority Watch List" and a "Watch List" annually as required under the law to identify countries that "deny adequate and effective protection for IPR or deny fair and equitable market access for persons that rely on intellectual property protection."
Last year, the Priority Watch List comprised China, Russia, Canada, Indonesia, Algeria, Argentina, Chile, India, Israel, Pakistan, Thailand and Venezuela.
Saudi Arabia was among 33 trading partners on the lower level Watch List, meriting what the USTR office called "bilateral attention to address the underlying IPR problems."
Others were Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Spain, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281
Task Force To Address Intellectual Property Crimes in USA
On February 12, 2010, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced the formation of a new Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property as part of a Department-wide initiative to confront the growing number of domestic and international intellectual property (IP) crimes. The Task Force, to be chaired by the Deputy Attorney General, will focus on strengthening efforts to combat intellectual property crimes through close coordination with state and local law enforcement partners as well as international counterparts. It will also monitor and coordinate overall intellectual property enforcement efforts at the Department, with an increased focus on the international aspects of IP enforcement, including the links between IP crime and international organized crime. Building on previous efforts in the Department to target intellectual property crimes, the Task Force will also serve as an engine of policy development to address the evolving technological and legal landscape of this area of law enforcement.
--
Dr.Tabrez Ahmad,
Associate Professor of Law,
KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India,
Website: www.site.technolexindia.com
Blog: http://tabrezahmad.technolexindia.com http://iplexindia.blogspot.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/tabrezahmad7.
Blogs: http://www.blogger.com/profile/15337756250055596327
Blog: http://drtabrez.wordpress.com
http://tabrezahmad.typepad.com/blog/
Research Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1189281