To appear in the CLAT entrance test the maximum age limit for a general
candidate was 20 years old and for scheduled category candidates 22 years old. But on 4th March, 2015 the Rajasthan
high court chief justice Sunil Ambwani and justice Prakash Gupta ruled that the
Legal Education Rules, 2008, not only on the ground that the Bar Council was
not competent, but also the Bar Council felt that the Rule is ultra vires the
provisions of Section 7(1)H and (i), 24(1)(c)(iii), and (iiia) or 49(1)(af),
(ag), and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, and also arbitrary, as it introduces
invidious classification by dividing the class of students artificially
creating a class by prescribing the maximum age limit for admission in Law
Courses, and further on the ground that there is no apparent object to be
served in prescribing the age of 20 years. It was also recovered that the statutes of the
National Law universities are silent of the max, age limit.
The court also ordered the withdrawal
of Clause 28 of Schedule-III appended to Rule 11 of the Rules of the Bar
Council of India. Considering the fact that a large population of the country
lives in rural areas, which also forms talent bank, from where the students can
be drawn for admission, to the top Law Colleges in the country.
The court has asked the CLAT 2015
convenor RMLNLU Lucknow to modify its application software so as not to reject
applications of candidates above the current age limit and to upload the high
court’s interim order on CLAT’s official website.
Advocate General of Rajasthan RN
Mathur who was appearing for CLAT 2015 convenor RMLNLU Lucknow asked the court
for time until 12 March to file a reply and to fix a date before CLAT
application deadline 31 March to dispose of the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment