| |
Academia.edu's office is at: 251 Kearny St., Suite 520, San Francisco, CA, 94108. To opt out of receiving these kinds of emails from Academia.edu, go to: http://www.academia.edu/t/cffZi/optout/d60262b79a3b4e0f226a020e600220cd
Tabrez Ahmad's Technolex
Technology, Education R&D, Consultancy,Hyperawareness,ODR,
Network of Law
The objective of the blog is to provide a fair analysis and awareness of legal issues in an easy way for the understanding of the people at large
| |
Academia.edu's office is at: 251 Kearny St., Suite 520, San Francisco, CA, 94108. To opt out of receiving these kinds of emails from Academia.edu, go to: http://www.academia.edu/t/cffZi/optout/d60262b79a3b4e0f226a020e600220cd
The dispute between Design Company Aerolab and Force India has been settled, on 23rd March, 2012, at the High Court in London. Sahara Force India was directed by the London High Court judge to pay outstanding fees of more than £700,000 to Aerolab, although Force India was handed just under £21,000 in compensation for use of its intellectual property.
This penalty comes in as a part of the declaration of an intellectual property dispute between the two teams. Despite the High Court ruling, the Silverstone-based team now plans to refer the matter to the FIA for further consideration given that using the intellectual property of other teams is banned under F1 rules. The UK High Court judgement, in respect of the illegal copying, will now be referred for the consideration of Formula One's governing body, the FIA," the team said, "whilst the Italian criminal case against Mike Gascoyne, Tony Fernandes and Jean Claude Migeot remains ongoing.
With already prevailing difficulties around reports that Vijay Mallya's Kingfisher Airlines may collapse following rising debts, frozen bank accounts, cancellation of flights and delay in salary payments, verdict on Force India might come as another blow for the tycoon. Aerolab had worked with Force India until 2009, when its ended the relationship over unpaid bills – with the company then starting work with the new Caterham team (then running under the Lotus name) just days later. Vijay Mallya's Formula One team had also alleged Aerolab and Caterham's chief technical officer Mike Gascoyne of misusing the team's intellectual property. However, Justice Arnold stated Force India "has come nowhere near establishing that. Force India claimed that the Lotus T127 had featured a large number of parts copied from Force India's design and although the court stated that the intellectual property rights had been used as a 'shortcut' it threw out claims that there has been 'systematic copying' of the design and said Force India hadn't come close to proving that to be the case.
Force India, which had prized its car designs at 15 million pounds ($23.8 million), may witness another hearing on legal costs, in May. It is said that the bill could be the final straw for struggling Mallya, who may now cede control of Force India to 42.5 per cent shareholder Subrata Roy, another billionaire of India. Relating to the teams' two-year intellectual property dispute, the High Court in London, however, also charged Aerolab for misuse of confidential information, and has asked the company to pay Rs 16.7 lakh (€25,000) to Force India. Some parts created using Force India confidential information were used on the Team Lotus race cars in the early part of the 2010 season.
Source: http://www.crash.net/f1/new,
http://sports.ndtv.com/formula-1/news/item
GMM
Image via WikipediaThe paper titled: "Comparative Analysis of Copyright Protection of Databases: The Path to Follow" , has been published today in the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR). Please click the below links to see the article.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1839325
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/13716
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/13716/1/JIPR%2017%282%29%20111-121.pdf
Thanking you,
Regards,